Pesto (Dozens of Books, The Remix)
“Did you get the Chester Himes book I left for you at the front desk, Trace?”
Trace grumbled into the receiver. “Why do you always drop them off at the hotel desk? Another missed opportunity for us to hook up. We don’t see each other often enough as it is, Amy.”
“I was in a hurry, Trace. Jenny had a ballet recital this afternoon and Josh is in trouble at school again. Look, I’ve got to go, honey. Evan and the kids’re going to be home at six and I still haven’t put dinner in the oven. I just wanted to make sure you got the book.”
“Yeah, I got it.”
Amy hung up and dropped the cell phone into her apron pocket. She had student compositions to grade and another chapter to write for her new novel — two weeks behind on deadline as usual — but Evan told her over breakfast that he had been craving her leg of lamb stuffed with basil pesto and she hadn’t done anything nice for her husband in awhile (except for that impromptu blowjob last Sunday afternoon while the kids were visting her mom — she still couldn’t believe how pissed off Trace got when she told him about that over lunch at The Castaway).
She retrieved the Cuisinart food processor from the cabinet above the kitchen sink and placed it on the tiled counter. Amy deposited the pesto sauce ingredients into the processor’s feed tube with great care: fresh, tender basil leaves, generous chunks of garlic, the best pine nuts and parmesan cheese from Trader Joe’s, olive oil, sea salt and peppercorns. She secured the lid on the Cuisinart and punched the button for puree.
Pesto, Amy knew, came from the Italian word pestare, which means to pound or bruise. Trace had lately been accusing her of pounding him — that’s the exact word he used — pounding him with her problems. It was true that he was a good listener and she didn’t want to be a burden on him but he always started it. Trace was the one inquiring as to her state of mind so she couldn’t help it if he didn’t like the reply. Amy was nothing but painfully honest.
She turned off the Cusinart before the pesto became too soupy and retrieved the leg of lamb from the fridge. Amy made a mental note to remind Evan that they needed to buy a new refrigerator before the warranty on the Kenmore expired at the end of next year.
She reached for the sharp Ginsu knife on the cutting board and began de-boning and trimming the excess fat from the lamb. In a way, she envied Trace. Living in a residential hotel seemed exciting, an adventure that he was constantly asking her to share with him. But the accompanying lifestyle would prove unbearable: no kitchen to speak of (he had a microwave and a bar fridge and that was it), no privacy in which to write and to grade her papers, and, of course, there was Trace’s romance with the bottle. She couldn’t figure out if he always drank that heavily or only when he was in her presence.
She spread the pesto sauce all over the inside of the leg of lamb and tied it with butcher string. She recalled the last time she had paid Trace a visit at his hotel. There were so many books in the room that she had either bought him or loaned him.
“It’s as if I already live here,” she had said with an amused smile. She liked the way his eyes lit up when she tossed off that remark. Poor fool. He was never going to see the truth. For a writer he sure could be a blinded idiot sometimes.
Amy settled the lamb into the Swiss Diamond roasting pan. It had to stand for one hour before cooking. She set the GE Cafe range to preheat to 350 and poured herself a glass of Santa Margherita Pinot Grigio.
Sipping her wine, Amy meditated on the palm fronds swaying in the wind outside the kitchen window. As hard as she tried, Amy couldn’t grasp the grand importance of love or lust. The poets couldn’t explain it to her, the great novelists failed to unravel its mysteries. It was, she thought, just an odious burden that got in the way of everything else that’s important in life.
Related Reading: Dozen of Books

April 18, 2008 at 9:05 pm
Rodger, I somehow see my self in the bottom of the Cuisinart, sharp blades, delusion beware. Some characters get all the perks, even if they’ll never get it.
April 18, 2008 at 9:13 pm
Thank you, Keith, a very astute analysis of the story. Thanks for reading and welcome aboard. Don’t be a stranger and give my best to everyone at Vesuvio.
April 19, 2008 at 5:23 am
Rodger
Honest ending–more often true than not. Chester was from Missouri–interesting mix in this piece.
April 19, 2008 at 10:53 am
Rodger,
Thanks for the comment. I am glad to be here. I’ve been a Wait’s fan since high school, Nighthawks at the Diner; Bukowski, Chandler, and Elmore Leonard set a mood in time that defines it, like sardonic beach tar that you have to wear off. And for something left of center, Murikami , Hard-Boiled Wonderland at the End of the World is distinctly Japanese pulp, post WW II with SciFi features. Thanks again, I look forward to reading more.
April 19, 2008 at 11:05 am
The Murikami title sounds very interesting, Keith. Intriguing title. I may have to look into that.
Scot, I greatly admire Himes. His Coffin Ed and Grave Digger Jones series of books turned pulp conventions on their ear. A strong, strong voice and his dialogue of the streets was remarkable.
April 19, 2008 at 6:37 pm
Creepy. Dissecting Trace along with the lamb.
April 19, 2008 at 6:41 pm
That’s one creepy way of looking at it, David.
April 20, 2008 at 10:33 am
Ironically, I tied some lamb with string yesterday, and then proceeded to overcook it. Lynn and I were both a little bummed even though our guests professed to love it. Life is a mystery.
Note: Santa Margherita was founded by a textile magnate, in Trentino-Alta Adige. That’s the province east of Lombardy along the Swiss-Austrian border. That’s where Lynn was when she learned her trade, in the famous textile mills around Lake Como.
April 20, 2008 at 12:42 pm
So, JM, you and Lynn share a strange connection with this Trace remix. Interestingly, the story is supposed to be set in Silverlake, where Amy lives, but I couldn’t find a way to seamlessly weave that into the narrative.
April 20, 2008 at 7:24 pm
I love the story but question the end. It’s written perfectly. It sounds great.
But I’ve never known a woman in my life - not a friend, not a relative, not an acquaintance - who “couldn’t grasp the grand importance of love or lust.”
That’s one damn unusual woman.
April 20, 2008 at 8:50 pm
She is indeed one damn unusual woman, Sandy.
April 21, 2008 at 4:14 am
Basil pesto with lamb? Hmmmmm, I’d prefer mint pesto, instead.
Joseph … Personally, I don’t think lamb can be overcooked, that is, up to a point.
…
April 21, 2008 at 9:58 am
Ok, I’ll buy that she is in real life or that you think she is. But this is written from her point of view, so I still have problems with her character.
Obviously, she doesn’t feel love. And I’ll buy that she’s one of those strange beings who doesn’t feel lust. But both?
Also, I think the story would hold together for me better, psychologically, if she were to question herself about it more, with a pinch of self-doubt thrown in -and you’re a master of “a pinch” in the same way a good cook is.
Maybe in the context of a book with this woman as a character, I’d see it. Or still, maybe not. Because she reminds me of someone I think is the most unbelievable character in fiction, Cathy in “East of Eden”, though not as evil in what deeds she would commit.
April 21, 2008 at 12:08 pm
I saw her as more detached from those feelings, rather than not feeling them at all. Obviously she is married and there is an implied affair with Trace (if only emotional) - but I think it’s possible to act on emotions like love and lust without feeling like you really understand them. Since she refers to them as an “odious burden” and that she doesn’t understand the “grand importance” of them - I think that the point is more than these emotions are causing complications in her life and she doesn’t see what’s so great about them. Here she is going out of her way to give Trace books, to make a nice meal for her husband instead of working on her own projects, and even as she does them, some other part of her is asking why she feels compelled to put these other people’s wants and needs before her own, and why is that such an important thing. Not only did I find her character believable, but as a wife (and mother) I related to her situation. I’ve certainly had similar moments from time to time.
April 21, 2008 at 12:18 pm
some other part of her is asking why she feels compelled to put these other people’s wants and needs before her own
Precisely. Thank you, Julie.
April 21, 2008 at 1:15 pm
Your welcome. Thanks for capturing the emotion. I think every wife (or even girlfriend) has felt like Amy at least once. That moment of narcissistic epiphany where you realize you’ve been so busy editing your husband’s short stories you haven’t written one of your own in forever, so busy taking your kid to acting classes you’ve given up on being in local plays, etc., etc. (Actually, it seems kind of appropriate with Mother’s Day coming up - how many mothers are expected to give up their own hopes, talents, and dreams for the sake of the success of the other people in their lives? Or at least feel like they are expected to do so?)
April 21, 2008 at 1:25 pm
Exactly, Julie, exactly. One might also note a certain materialistic shallowness in Amy. She doesn’t reach for the blender, it’s a Cuisinart. The groceries are from Trader Joe’s. The knife is a Ginsu. These are things that Trace cannot give her, she says as much to herself in the story.
April 21, 2008 at 1:52 pm
Actually, I did notice that. Nice touch. =)
April 21, 2008 at 4:35 pm
If a character gets people feeling way differently about them, then that’s an interesting character!
Julie, I don’t think Amy’s feelings are the same as the ones every wife and mother has from time to time. You can bet I know those feelings and I’d believe them in a written character, too.
I take Rodger on his word when he says Amy “couldn’t grasp the grand importance of love and lust.” He didn’t say what you did, about “without feeling like you (she, Amy) really understand(s). them.”
It’s not the ‘understanding’ of something (love and lust) that this is about. It’s about “not grasping the importance of them”. Those are two different things. I love that phrase about “not grasping”! It’s way more complex and interesting, yet, paradoxically, it also is at the root of my problem with the character.
I still say most women don’t feel that way - except, yes, in those moments that we spoke of earlier, when they’re tired or bored or fed up with or sad or whatever - about their everyday lives.
But our gal here has this as a long-standing perception. She’s intelligent - she’s read novels and poetry about love and lust…and just doesn’t see what the fuss is. I say that is rare. That’s a Cathy, that’s a talented Mr. Ripley.
I do believe people like that exist, but they usually live lives apart. I don’t buy this woman as an upper middle class woman maintaining a family, a job, kids with ballet classes, a cuisinart. She would have been sniffed out and rejected by the pack long ago, or more likely, not have joined in the first place. Because those kind of people have something missing- not only don’t they grasp the importance of the most elemental of human needs, but they don’t know how to fake it very long, either. Note her objections to not moving into the exciting hotel lifestyle with Trace. She says nothing about her children! A normal woman would say, “Ah screw ‘em. They don’t appreciate what I do for them.” Or something more literate to that effect. You cannot feel that way about your children and not have people notice.
I’m not sure Rodger wants her to be that kind of being, which is why I want him to humanize her, make her into that ordinary wife or mother with “those moments.”
With all my readerly instincts, I think Amy has to be changed into an ordinary woman who, in flirting with Trace, is flirting with another lifestyle. Then it would make sense for her to admit that sometimes, she doesn’t understand herself, love, or lust and sometimes doesn’t give a damn. That would involve a re-working of the last paragraph.
Keep it the same, then she’s a monster, like Cathy.
I apologize for taking up space for my tirade, Rodger. Is that an impolite thing to do on someone’s home turf? I don’t mean to be rude; this is my first time being a “fan” reader and actually interacting with the writer.
April 21, 2008 at 4:47 pm
How can your opinion be impolite, Sandy?
Look, in this revision of a Trace story, we have taken the character down off the pedestal that Trace had hoisted her upon and what we see is …
… well, perhaps a monster as you suggest.
April 21, 2008 at 5:43 pm
But, why does she need to be like a more ordinary woman? I’ll be the first to admit I’m hardly your typical female - there’s a reason I currently have no close female friends besides my own sister - but that’s exactly what makes the story unique. Rodger is highlighting an example of a wife and mother that is too often called “unbelievable” (as you are doing here). Well you know what? I exist and I’m tired of people telling me I don’t. Maybe I like to see a reflection of myself (even if it’s myself in my worst moments) in a literary character. I’m a well educated woman living an upper middle class lifestyle and I try to put my husband and my daughter before my own needs, but I’ll be damned if I don’t have moments where I get frustrated that I’m not working on my own story submissions instead of my husband’s, or where I don’t fantasize (however briefly) of running away to some artistic gypsy lifestyle like I thought I would have when I was 18, and there are certainly times where love seems more inconvienient than noble. I look at characters like Amy, however “unrealistic” she may seem to you, and say there but for the grace of God go I. (Also, who says no one else has noticed? We have no perspective from her husband or anyone else is her life - perhaps they are very aware of her issues.)
April 21, 2008 at 6:50 pm
Hi to Julie,
You said you might see part of yourself reflected in the character (in your worst moments). You say Amy exists and you exist and that I’m denying that (or denying the struggles a woman like that has. I know exactly what you mean about “being tired” of the way affluent women are regarded in this society, like they have no right to feel unhappy just because they have what looks like the good life from the outside.
But I see you nothing LIKE Amy! And by the way, I don’t necessarily mean you as you, personally, because I don’t know you. I mean Amy if she were written differently. But let me use ‘you’ to distinguish from the character as written now, if that makes sense.
I see ‘you’ as passionate - whatever you feel, I can tell it’s all the way! I see her as flat of affect.
I see ‘you’ as a person who gets frustrated sometimes and disillusioned sometimes, perhaps by the often humdrum ‘happily ever after’ ove sometimes - in other words, ‘you’ are REAL. Definitely believable, as a character.
But Amy is placid in what she does and says. In the pesto analogy: Trace complains she pounds him with her problems. but I don’t think she does. That’s just his version of her when she says, placidly, “Look hon, I gotta go pick up the kids at soccer and talk to my son about his fucking up and then I have to buy fresh ingredients for the pesto. etc…” She’s not pounding him, she’s just listing the things she has to do, and it all seems overwhelming to him who has no everyday life in the burbs with the kids.
Ironically, if pesto means pounding, Amy is the opposite, even in her cooking. She does everything methodically! ‘You’, I can see pounding the food. Maybe even breaking a rolling pin. And I mean that as a compliment! It’s a more believable reaction. And if ‘you’ aren’t the overtly emotive type, ‘you’ll’ pound yourself, internally, I don’t see Amy doing either.
The fact is, as Trace realizes deep inside, Amy just toys with him and with fantasies of being a bohemian. Even Amy can’t believe he actually believes her. ‘You’ might toy, ‘you’ might fantasize - but ‘you’ definitely are able to FEEL, in the realm of love and lust. She cannot.
We don’t need her husband or her kids or friends for their version. We just need a little bit of Trace to act as fixed reckoning point, like in celestial navigation.
So let me rephrase my conclusion. I think Rodger can’t have it both ways. Either Amy’s the character of real woman who has to act more like one, with SOME sign of internal distress to the reader - or she’s a monster minus the husband and the kids & the cuisinart (she has a cook.) I might find it acceptable to make her a rich man’s mistress.
Actually, he CAN have it this way under one condition: that this be written BY Trace, ABOUT Amy’s life. About what he thinks she thinks, and not from her pov.
April 21, 2008 at 6:51 pm
Trace was very aware of Amy’s issues but he was blind to how he was being manipulated.
Well you know what? I exist and I’m tired of people telling me I don’t.
Tell it, sister. Amen to that.
there are certainly times where love seems more inconvienient than noble.
Yep, and that would be the point of the story.
Thank you, Julie. Your skills move beyond that of a copy editor.
April 21, 2008 at 6:59 pm
She’s not pounding him, she’s just listing the things she has to do, and it all seems overwhelming to him who has no everyday life in the burbs with the kids.
Huh, Sandy? Did you miss this in the story:
(except for that impromptu blowjob last Sunday afternoon while the kids were visting her mom — she still couldn’t believe how pissed off Trace got when she told him about that over lunch at The Castaway).
April 21, 2008 at 7:01 pm
Or this …
Trace was the one inquiring as to her state of mind so she couldn’t help it if he didn’t like the reply. Amy was nothing but painfully honest.
April 21, 2008 at 7:14 pm
You’, I can see pounding the food. Maybe even breaking a rolling pin. And I mean that as a compliment! It’s a more believable reaction. And if ‘you’ aren’t the overtly emotive type, ‘you’ll’ pound yourself, internally, I don’t see Amy doing either.
Ahahahahah! You don’t know me very well (Of course you don’t - such is the nature of the internet). Oh… my husband could tell you stories… I pound people plenty with my problems and I’m sure Amy does as well. I pound my husband with my problems until he’s ready to scream. I once pounded my (male) best friend nearly all the way into an emotional affair. (It might even have been an emotional affair - it was kind of complicated.) I suffer from what is very likely Borderline Personality Disorder, which my husband complains I wear on my chest like a shield (”La la la… I have no control over my emotions… I’m mentally ill, so you can’t critize me… la la la…”
I know Amy. She lurks somewhere deep in my subconcious. She comes out when the BPD gets to me just a little too much. If I seem so “normal” to you it is only because I’m impossibly blessed with an amazingly patient husband who’s mother is crazier than I am. He exists, too, by the way - although even I’m sometimes surprised at the nonsense he’s willing to put up with.
April 21, 2008 at 7:16 pm
Rodger - Your welcome, by the way. Although really I’m just defending myself, which I’m always a little too happy to do.
April 21, 2008 at 7:28 pm
Sandy, who wrote the rule that fictional characters have to be based on people we know? We trust the writer and his or her life experience to introduce us to people we’ve never met before. According to many, that is the function of fiction. I think I see the crux of your troubled approach to this story.
April 21, 2008 at 10:33 pm
Well guys, you’re pesto-ing me, and my head is bloody (green, oozy blood) - but unbowed.
I just don’t buy the character - which is unusual, because since I ‘discovered’ you as a writer, Rodger, I’ve been there with every nuance of all your people. And of course I already know that little mini-course you gave me on fictional characters. I’m basing my criticism on the character AS WRITTEN!
The blow job thing was adorable and perfect - but it came two paragraphs later from where she tells us Trace accused her of pounding him with her problems. I don’t see the connection here I mean, there IS a connection, but not with respect to my particular complaint.
Julie, you sound much more fun than Amy! And obviously, you’re in sync here with the gosh-darned WRITER of this character!
So I can only conclude that I am not articulating my argument well at all, because if I were, you’d both defect from your positions.
Now I’m hungry. Whatever else I could say about Amy, I bet the meal was delicious.
good night to all
April 21, 2008 at 11:09 pm
So I can only conclude that I am not articulating my argument well at all, because if I were, you’d both defect from your positions.
I’m not being snide here, Sandy, but that pretty much says it all.
The character didn’t work for you. Fine. That’s your prerogative as a reader. Steinbeck doesn’t work for me but, hey, they gave him the Nobel so what the hell do I know?
April 21, 2008 at 11:13 pm
By the way, I’m not being resistant to your ideas. You just didn’t convince me. A few months ago, Julie pummelled me for half a day over an opening graph to a story that was muddled and confusing. Eventually, she won her argument through sound logic and the story was changed.
you’re in sync here with the gosh-darned WRITER of this character
And, yes, I’ve considered David and Julie Scott as good personal friends for almost two years now, perhaps more, so maybe Julie is more “in sync” with me than the average reader but that doesn’t subtract from her skills as a superb analyst of the written word. If only I could get her and David to stop playing D&D and replace it with literature. I’m working on it …
… we’re all reading Miss Lonelyhearts, right?
April 22, 2008 at 1:05 am
I actually have been thinking about this on and off throughout my evening. Ultimately, Amy seems too bland a character for me to find her interesting. I can’t pick up any inconsistency which gives a character its life. From whichever angle I examine, she’s too smooth, too unruffled. Even as she “pounds Trace” with her problems, she’s merely reciting them. Not even her problems are problems to her. They’re…inconveniences at worst. And she’s not even one of those people who are placid on the outside while carrying a raging cauldron of emotion simmering within. No, sigh, she has her papers to grade, her novel to write, her son to straighten out, her daughter to chauffer, her ersatz lover to throw bones to, her husband to throw bones to, her palm fronds to watch, sigh, her wine to sip. She’ll do it - because she doesn’t give a damn about any of it.
Julie, I do see why you identify with her, I thought about that - she has done things analagous to what you have done or thought or said or thought about doing. And I identify with all that too! I submit I’m at least as semi-crazy as you are (without either of us being certifiable enough to incarcerate!). But now that I brought myself into the equation, I hope you can see I’m not attacking YOUR life, I’m not denying you or your feelings.
It’s not the outward actions she engages in that matter in the slightest - it’s the reasoning behind it that is suspect. Her reasoning for her actions is different than mine, even though the end result might look the same. There’s nothing there behind her. Behind me there’s fear and false pride and hope and confusion and maybe love and definitely lust and ambition and all the stuff of life spinning around together in my mind and heart. But she’s like an old movie set for westerns, where actors walk through the saloon door, only to find the same unbroken prarie on the other side.
Sure, I’d like to see her fall from the pedestal Trace has placed her upon. But I’d like it to be because he sees she doesn’t really exist, that she is no one, that he, for all his flaws, is far more a living, breathing, suffering - and thus compelling - human being, than she is.
But the biggest clue of all is right in the story.
“As hard as she tried, Amy couldn’t grasp the grand importance of love or lust.” Nobody truly understands love or lust. But if I ever meet anyone who “can’t grasp the grand importance” of either, I’d run like hell. That’s a rare and inhuman animal.
Rodger, I don’t quite know how to leave this, other than with a remark that it’s obvious I had strong feelings against this character! I don’t think I’m interested in carrying on with my objections. Julie, you reacted strongly too, but your reasons seem more cohesive than mine, which I can’t explain.
On another note: I just began Miss Lonelyhearts and I’m loving it! When is the discussion?
Sandy
April 22, 2008 at 1:37 am
She’ll do it - because she doesn’t give a damn about any of it.
You finally got it! Whew!
I’m thinking of the Lonelyhearts dialogue for around May 9, when I get back from a business trip to L.A. I’ll set up a seperate page (see tabs at top of page) for discssion.
It’s a remarkable little book, isn’t it?
April 22, 2008 at 1:45 am
But she’s like an old movie set for westerns, where actors walk through the saloon door, only to find the same unbroken prarie on the other side.
Beautifully conveyed, by the way …
April 22, 2008 at 7:01 am
Rodger - David finished it, I’m reading it now…
Not as in love with it as you all are… just warning you, but I’ll save my thoughts for the big discussion.
Thanks for the wonderful compliments! =)
April 22, 2008 at 11:26 am
Just finished Miss Lonelyhearts and I’m officially confused.
How can Sandy love Miss Lonelyhearts and yet claim that Amy is an unrealistic character?
To each their own I suppose, but the two characters do not seem terribly far from one another. Just saying. Is all.
April 22, 2008 at 11:53 am
We’ll have to let Sandy explain that one. I’ll open a page for Lonelyhearts discussion shortly.
April 22, 2008 at 12:30 pm
Just got two chapters into Miss Lonelyhearts and decided to delay my gratification until the weekend’s leisure. I don’t want to read it in bits and pieces. The style engaged me immediately. The writing was so vivid it sizzled. The contrast between Lonelyhearts and Shrike looks to be wicked fun and deep pathos. I alternately laughed and pitied (something I prize in a reading experience). Saturday I’ll start from the beginning.
April 22, 2008 at 12:34 pm
Cool. There’s a tab at the top of the page for discussion. Might be spoilers up there so I wouldn’t read it until you finish the book.