EVERYTHING I KNOW ABOUT JOURNALISM I LEARNED FROM HUNTER S. THOMPSON
It’s true. In 1979, I devoured Thompson’s classic Hell’s Angels and the intense journalism collection, The Great Shark Hunt. Of Shark Hunt, the Washington Post praised:
In addition to being a testament to the undeniably beatifying properties of American excess–literary, political, chemical, you name it–Hunter Thompson is the high priest of the ad hominem attack. Anyone unlucky enough to get in the way of his satirical sledgehammer will end up with soup for brains. Still, even Thompson needs a good villain to get properly lathered up; that’s why he peaked simultaneously with America’s 37th president, Richard Milhous Nixon. Tricky Dick was Thompson’s dark-jowled, pale-calved Muse, and with his departure Thompson seemed to lose his place a bit. Swatting flies with a baseball bat.
Of course, aping Thompson’s journalistic style set me up for a journalistic career with a limited path for publication. Journalism with a first-person voice is not always an easy sell unless the narrator is considered an expert on the subject at hand. Eventually I relied on my J school knowledge and broadened my market to the drone-like world of trade journalism but I’m pretty much through with that. I just started writing book reviews for Pop Matters and there’s a lot of room for Thompson-esque writing in that market.
Anyway, I’m straying from the point because it’s Sunday evening, there’s Phillip Glass on the radio, and I’m stupid from pain pills as I write this. Or was it that something I smoked in that pipe? Probably a combination of both. Okay, so there’s a terrific article by Ruthe Stein in the April 20 edition of the San Francisco Chronicle about a new documentary on Dr. Gonzo:
It somehow seems appropriate to end a 15-day marathon of 105 movies and special programs with a tribute to this occasional San Franciscan and master of gonzo journalism. He came up with “gonzo” to describe his freestyle, drugs- and booze-fueled writing found in books such as “Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas” and “Fear and Loathing: On the Campaign Trail ‘72.” Chunks of both were composed in the Bay Area. While Thompson’s home was in Woody Creek, Colo., his heart and soul were in San Francisco.
This was his kind of town, and he was witness to events that became part of the city and all of Northern California’s tapestry. Thompson was the caretaker of the Big Sur Hot Springs in 1961, right before it became Esalen. He moved to the Haight-Ashbury in the mid-1960s, arriving just as hippies were settling in. He became a familiar, boisterous figure at local watering holes for years while churning out lengthy pieces for Rolling Stone and other publications.
AND SPEAKING OF JOURNALISM …
Joseph Mailander writes about judging a high school journalism contest and wistfully recalls the heady days of the Los Angeles Times:
When I was in college, my father even used to include the newspapers of the past week in my care packages. And I’m glad he did, because I got to follow most memorably writings on local architecture, and it was a key time in LA for developments such as the Pacific Design Center and also megastructure downtown. And Sunday without the New York Times was unthinkable.
AND WHAT ABOUT THOSE “CITIZEN JOURNALISTS”?
Okay, before anyone starts hurling rocks at me, I genuinely like the folks at Metroblogging L.A.; in fact, BLA hosts two of my favorite local bloggers, Will Campbell and David Markland. But I have a real problem with the Metroblogging slogan TAKE BACK YOUR LOCAL MEDIA. Let’s start with a quote from this posting by Jason Burns (who does a fantastic Archiving Angeles series) from April 18:
There has been much criticism of late regarding one of the world’s most venerable news institutions. A sale, a few firings, a revolving door of editors. Ever since the term new media was coined, “professional” journalists and corporate new outlets have chuckled at the competition known as the blog. Bloggers are not journalists. They are not media. They are not people. Newspapers are the news. They are the ones who deliver the cold hard facts of the day – unless it’s a story on Tupac. Whoops.
Fine. But if BLA is the standard by which we are defining citizen journalists — I despise that phrase — and the concept of “taking back the local media” then we’ve got a long way to go. Just look at a sampling of some of the stories that BLA is breaking for you:
A guy flashing his tattoo (April 18); a petition against a new city law requiring taco trucks to move on after one hour (April 18); A Grilled Cheese Invitational Cook-Off (April 17); Ruth writes about the sewers being cleaned out (what an apt unintentional metaphor) in her Silverlake neighborhood (April 17); and Travis pokes fun at functionally illiterate restaurant workers. I could go on and on but I think the point speaks for itself.
AND LASTLY …
The secret words of the week are spooky flute. If you hear anyone say “spooky flute” this week you have to give them one hundred dollars. Or buy them lunch. Whichever is most convenient.
Previously: Book Club, Anyone?


I think there should be a definite line in the sand with blogs.
There should be editorial blogs and pr blogs, just like in the print world.
I think if we did that the “citizen” journalist title wouldn’t be such a big joke.
You can’t really be a journalist if all of your info is from the internet or your friends, but maybe some people have bigger friends, who knows?
By the way, nice blog and that’s said in truth, no sarcasm, though I’m addicted to that…
browne
By: Browne on April 20, 2008
at 8:18 pm
Thank you, Browne. There should at least be clear distinctions. I don’t want to hear the argument that photos of Parking Retard of the Day is someone’s idea of journalism so, ergo, it is journalism. I call bullshit on that.
By: Rodger Jacobs on April 20, 2008
at 8:24 pm
Not everything on Metblogs is journalism, but it is always localized media. I’d like to see more community journalism on the site, but we’re staffed entirely by volunteers, and we don’t assign, edit, or reject entries… we just ask that they’re about Los Angeles.
I don’t, however, understand the relevency of Browne’s comment that there should be a distinction between editorial and PR blogs, at least with regards to Metblogs. We’re sent press releases all the time. We rarely, if ever, use them. If an event is posted, its usually because someone is planning to go or they think it sounds like an interesting event. As the “city captain,” I’ve always insisted that authors spell out, clearly, any potential conflict of interest.
Parking tards, though, is commentary. I think if you get too hung up on what defines “journalism” and what doesn’t you’re quickly forgetting that these are BLOGS, which can be a hell of a lot of different things.
That said, Metblogs has journalism. It has commentary. And it can have some random, crazy shit. But, I’d like to think that it is rarely, if ever, boring.
/long winded rant
By: David Markland on April 21, 2008
at 12:00 am
Thanks, Markland. Comments duly noted and I shall reply further in the morning when I’m not punch drunk from work and ready to retire.
You do raise a good point: Unlike LAist, Met Blogs does not have a tendency to run press releases to fill up white space.
By: Rodger Jacobs on April 21, 2008
at 12:52 am
RJ
Catchy title…a lot of people I know with journalism degrees are doing something else
By: Scot on April 21, 2008
at 3:27 am
I think a Hunter S. Thompson book should be next on book club list.
Still working on Miss Lonelyhearts, but I should be done with it today.
Spooky flute sounds like a good name for a goth DJ.
By: Julie Scott on April 21, 2008
at 11:53 am
Yes, Scot, as the 21st century grinds on and shapes and defines itself, journalists are getting lost in the mix or at the very least their role in society and western culture is being redefined and re-examined.
Julie, I think Shark Hunt is too long for a book club selection but Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas is just right.
By: Rodger Jacobs on April 21, 2008
at 12:22 pm
David, my point is thus: How is BLA living up to their slogan with so many banal and trite postings? Will and yourself and Jason Burns and Frazgo post some good material — Will has carved a niche for himself as spokesman for L.A. cyclists — but why should I give a damn about knitting circles, parking problems, or, pulling something from this morning, a blogger’s irritability with shopping at a pet store chain:
Putting aside my feelings of utter betrayal by the universe that I paid for some rocks, the visit was totally excruciating. Because the people? Sucked. The store was very crowded and people went out of their way to get in my way. Employees, my fellow shoppers, everyone. Also the line went halfway through the store and moved very slowly. I finally paid my $4.32 and convinced the clerk that I did not want a bag for my bag of rocks (honestly, that is more stupid than putting a bottled beer into a glass), and I retreated from the store for what I hope will be forever.
That kind of shallow narcissistic grousing is taking back the media? Please. Tell Sean you guys need a new slogan.
By: Rodger Jacobs on April 21, 2008
at 12:57 pm
we don’t assign, edit, or reject entries
You isolated the affliction right there, David.
By: Rodger Jacobs on April 21, 2008
at 1:02 pm
FWIW, its the trite stuff that attracted me to Metroblogging in the first place. I love to read people’s experiences in the city. But, I hear you.
As for those bastards at LAist, I think they do stil have a lot of listy fluff, but they’re doing some awesome writing and community journalism as well. They work on a different model, and I’d argue are more and more a corporate blog along the lines of Gawker Media (with better writing, dare I say).
Regardless, I think the noise to sound ratio on all blogs is a little high. But, its free, and all one has to do is scroll down to read something else.
By: David Markland on April 21, 2008
at 1:15 pm
David, I’m much more impressed with LAist after Zach Behrens took over the reins. He’s been doing a fantastic job. I read LAist a couple of times daily — or as often as they update — but I rarely comment there like I do at BLA.
By: Rodger Jacobs on April 21, 2008
at 1:18 pm
I think of HST as a writer rather than a journalist. To me, Fear and Loathing on the Campaign Trail 1972 is the high-water mark.
I also don’t think that any blog is under any obligation to be journalistic. There may be journalists who write blogs, but when they write about their daily lives they are just as valid as bloggers as when they investigate politics.
All this stuff about bloggers as citizen journalists is trivializing to bloggers who can be just about anything at all, from journalist to entertainer to novelist to poet to diarist. Are deejays journalists? The blogger’s main duty is to keep it spinning, it’s not to tear down Washington. If that happens in the process though—yeah.
By: joseph on April 21, 2008
at 10:30 pm
I’ve always considered HST a writer first and a journalist second but one can learn a lot about journalism from reading his collected essays. A lot.
By: Rodger Jacobs on April 21, 2008
at 11:03 pm