
Colonial Bank
P.O. Bx 1108
Montgomery, Alabama 36101
Dear Colonial Bank,
How are you? It must be very odd running the twenty-first largest bank in the U.S. from inside a post office box. I’ll bet your desks are awfully small and office parties can be awkward as all hell, but I imagine that Colonial Bancgroup has had to downsize a lot lately, what with that $880 million hit you guys took in ‘08 from bad Florida mortgages, as well as the $168 million CBG lost in the first quarter of ‘09, not to mention the multi-million dollar shareholder class action suit filed against you in March that alleges, among other things, extremely shoddy management issues from the top on down. And I see that you have petitioned the government for $540 million in bailout funds but it doesn’t appear that can happen until you cough up $300 million in private equity. Things have been tough for you, Colonial. I’m so sorry. I’ve done my best to help you, though, and that is the point of this letter.
Let me start out by saying that I am disabled and the main source of my income for many years has been Social Security Disability. I receive supplemental income from time to time that does not conflict with my disability benefits so it’s safe to assume that I live on a tight budget, pretty much hand-to-mouth and month-to-month. When I first opened my account at Colonial in January ‘09 I was extended a complimentary credit of $600.00 for overdrafts; what that means, in essence, is that Colonial would cover any charges I incurred against my account up to $600.00, charge me a fee of $36.00 for every processed transaction, and then I would make it all good, offsetting the deficit with the next deposit, usually that of my co-signer on the account. We had a good thing going there, Colonial. If I needed to pay my gas bill or electric bill or phone bill, you were there to make up the difference if I fell short. (You’ll notice, incidentally, that all of my expenses are day to day expenses — rent and utilities and groceries; rarely, if ever, will you see a charge for a restaurant or a movie theater or an airline or a hotel or … well, you get the picture).
April was a bad month for me, Colonial. My supplemental income dried up and went away, gone with the Great Recession. I continued paying my bills but you began refusing to honor my transactions whenever my account was too low or in overdraft; this resulted in numerous items being returned after processing — often twice, at $36.00 a pop to me — and a mad, month-long scramble in April to keep up with what was being paid and what was being returned. Once I received an NSF notice in the mail postmarked a full seven days after the transaction was made. All in all, I paid Colonial Bank $783.00 in fees in the month of April. It was a crazy time, I tell you, but not as crazy as what happened next.
On May 1, 2009, my Social Security Disability direct deposit landed in my account, as usual. But right behind it dropped in two NSF fees for $36.00 each. I called my local branch manager, Anna S., and requested that she reverse the fees since federal law and Social Security regulations mandate that a bank cannot offset an account’s negative balance, including overdraft and NSF fees, against future direct deposit SS benefits (Lopez vs. Washington Mutual, Federal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, 2002).
“I’ll reverse two of your charges,” Anna S. told me in a gruff tone as if reprimanding a child, not a 50-year old grown adult, “and I will also note in your account that no further courtesy reversals can ever be made against this account and, further, I would like to remind you that we reserve the option to close your account at our discretion.”
Anna S. made me very sad, Colonial.
“Reverse two charges?” I balked. “There are multiple offsets that were made against my direct deposit. The law requires that you reverse them all.”
Anna S. (who apparently has never heard of the FDIC or the federal government, for that matter) would hear none of it. The matter was over. And, further, Anna told me, my complimentary overdraft limit has been reduced to $150.00, down from $600.00, something that “automatically happens … out of our control” when an account exceeds five overdrafts.
Let me cut to the chase here, Colonial: I went over Anna’s head, straight to the Regional District Manager, David B., because I did not warm up to Anna’s attitude or her attempt at a compromise. You know what I got for my efforts? Five NSF reversals — an admission of error if I’ve ever seen one – and a strong admonition that my personal account was now on probation: one overdraft, even for ten cents, David assured me, and then they would shut down my account without notice. I should mention in passing that David B., when hearing the tale of financial hardship that $783.00 in bank fees has created for me, rendered a long oration about how bankers cannot make decisions “based on emotion” because “the system is not set up that way” but when I mentioned that Anna S. was the branch manager I had an issue with, he enthused:
“Oh, I’ve known Anna for years; we came up in the banking business together and worked at another financial institution togther before Colonial.” I could practically see them trimming flowers together and sipping coffees on the Left Bank in Paris (the artificial one they have created somewhere here on the Vegas Strip).
And it was on Anna’s decision, Branch Manager Dominatrix, David told me, that he conceded to lock up the account against future overdrafts. Was that a decsion based on “emotion”? I’m not sure. The complexities of David and Anna’s relationship are not my concern here. All I know is I got back $180.00 of my money that Colonial snatched from me but as a result of my effort my complimentary overdraft limit was reduced to zero and now I have to consider the possibility of paying only my groceries, medical expenses and co-pays, and utilities this month and not my rent.
But wait until you hear the part when I was afforded the opportunity to eavesdrop on a telephone conversation between Amanda, a customer service rep at your phone bank in Alabama, and Anna S., my branch manager in Las Vegas, about me and the problems with my account. I don’t think sweet-talkin’ Alabama peach Amanda is all that bright, Colonial, she didn’t realize I was still on the line during the three-way conversation.
More tomorrow …


Wow. After reading this it seems as if their tagline — “You’ll like it here” — isn’t a coaxing invitation so much as a command.
By: Will Campbell on May 8, 2009
at 6:35 am
Yes, Will, that rather obtuse slogan has taken on a whole new meaning for me.
By: Rodger Jacobs on May 8, 2009
at 10:42 am
What is that old tired cliche, “The business of America is business”?
Well we’re getting the business alright, I think the old neighborhood loan sharks had more understanding and humanity than a bank like Colonial. At least you could talk to a human being, cop a plea, pay something on the vig, and not get fucked over by some paperwork shuffler changing the rules of the game to benefit themselves.
And besides, the vigorish was cheaper than the banks and credit card companies are getting away with nowadays.
Go figure.
By: don quixote on May 8, 2009
at 8:09 am
Yesterday, a counselor at the Consumer Credit Counseling Service of Southern Nevada told me, upon hearing the whole tale: “These type of horror stories about banks are becoming increasingly common these days.”
By: Rodger Jacobs on May 8, 2009
at 10:44 am
Rodger,
First let me say that although legally you may be correct that the NSF fees should have been reversed, you have some culpability in this. I understand that you are on SS disability and have limited funds. However, when did it become the bank’s responsibility to “loan” you money upfront to pay your bills.
The fact is you overdrew your account, apparently many, many times and expected Colonial Bank to front you the money until you got your next disability check. If you think the bank did you wrong, try this. Close your checking account and try paying your bills on time. When you are not able to pay the rent or your utilities, see how much “credit” your landlord or utility company will give you. They’ll evict you or cut off your utilities. Does that make them bad actors? No. It’s a business, not a charity. If all their customers were like you, how would you expect them to stay in business?
I sympathize with your situation; but, it’s not the bank’s responsibility to help you. Try a local charity or a church. Are you able to do any work? Perhaps you could work from home or some other part-time work to supplement your income. Good luck to you.
By: Thomas on May 22, 2009
at 6:44 am
Thomas,
Of course I had supplemental income, which unexpectedly went away in late March of this year, creating the financial backdraft that fed this situation with the bank.
However, when did it become the bank’s responsibility to “loan” you money upfront to pay your bills.
I never said it was their responsibility but it was a courtesy they had extended to me in the past until they revoked it without warning. Incidentally, in the language and interpretation of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Lopez vs. Washington Mutual, the court agreed that any time a financial institution paid an incoming draft and then charged a fee for the transaction the bank was engaging in a “loan”; the bank can call it anything they want but the language of the court contends that it’s a loan.
It’s a business, not a charity. If all their customers were like you, how would you expect them to stay in business?
C’mon, Thomas, we’re talking about a bank that lost $880 million in ‘08 from underwater Florida mortgages and their solution was to ask Treasury for a $540 million loan to keep them afloat. The Federal government is a business, not a charity. If all banks were like this, how can we expect them to stay in business?
By: Rodger Jacobs on May 22, 2009
at 11:25 am
As I said before, I am sympathetic to your position and the position of millions of other families who lost income and were unable to make ends meet. Some of those people are the ones who held those Florida mortgages.
You say the Federal government is a business, not a charity. I disagree. Business strives to earn money whereas Government strives to spend it. Wouldn’t you agree that even Social Security Disability is a form of charity. I agree with you that banks shouldn’t have been afforded bailouts and should have been allowed to fail. However, they failed as a result of “loaning” people money who couldn’t repay their debts. This includes mortgages and those who overdrew their accounts.
They should have given you notice, morally speaking, as to the revocation of the NSF credit; but I don’t see how they were legally required to do so.
Incidentally, in your original post, you stated that you only pay your rent and utilities and rarely go out to eat or to the movies. However, you said you incurred $783 in NSF fees in April. By my calculations, at $36.00 a pop, you overdrew your account approximately 21 times or so. Sounds like more than rent and utilities there.
I’m not completely supporting the bank here, but, I believe it’s long past due that we return to an era of personal responsibility.
By: Thomas on May 22, 2009
at 12:41 pm
Sounds like more than rent and utilities there.
Yup. I have six chronic medical conditions and I have hefty pharmacy co-pays each month, as well as my monthly doctor visits, and out of pocket expenses for pharmaceutical needs that are not met by Medicare (if I earned a mere $10.00 less per month I would qualify for Medicaid and those out of pocket expenses would be met). Because of two of my conditions, I am not allowed to consume processed foods on a regular basis, so my grocery bills are a little higher than some folks who can just pop a cheap TV dinner in the oven. That’s where the money is going, Thomas.
Wouldn’t you agree that even Social Security Disability is a form of charity.
Is a pension a form of charity? I paid into Social Security as do millions of others in this country. When the federal government takes money from my paycheck every week, puts it in a bank to earn interest, and those funds are available to me should I become disabled (or upon retirement), I hardly look upon that as charity; if anything, it’s a compulsory savings account.
They should have given you notice, morally speaking, as to the revocation of the NSF credit; but I don’t see how they were legally required to do so.
Well, when discussing legal obligations over moral obligations, I think it’s always important to err on the side of jurisprudence. Is that what I hear you saying?
By: Rodger Jacobs on May 22, 2009
at 1:09 pm
if I earned a mere $10.00 less per month I would qualify for Medicaid and those out of pocket expenses would be met
Well hell’s bells, RJ, ask for a $10 cut in pay. Find a way. Work out an arrangement.
…
By: Kitty on May 22, 2009
at 3:30 pm
They won’t let me, K. That solution came to my mind years ago. The IRS is more flexible than the SSA; nothing is negotiable with Social Security. Everything is based on actuary tables and the level of your disability, the cost of living in any given year, the state where you live, a whole myriad of factors. The rate you are offered is a totally non-negotiable take-it-or-leave-it affair.
By: Rodger Jacobs on May 22, 2009
at 4:26 pm
You do work, so you’re not a free loader. These programs were meant for people just like you. Christalmighty, ten f’n bucks.
…
By: Kitty on May 22, 2009
at 4:34 pm
Even my Medical Social Worker can’t find a way around it, K.
By: Rodger Jacobs on May 22, 2009
at 4:47 pm
Wow -I hope this post hasn’t become to stale for my rants. “The Friendly One” ie. Colonial Bank cost me over $917.00 is Over-draft fees. They charged Overdraft fees -on top of Overdraft fees, and Previous Days Over-Draft Fees.
The total was 2% of my deposits from a period of October 2008 to today, which don’t figure any activity today -since I only keep the account open so that I can use it for on-line history.
Oh, I use the October date because that was when -and they know -I was hospitalized and had no income.
I can be a friendly one too -to your face. And if it was within me, screw you.
By: Scott Hamlin on August 10, 2009
at 4:32 am